Mises Daily

The Virtue of Competition

At Harvard University, a famous defender of communitarianism, Michael Sandel of the Department of Government, has denounced competition and is supposed to have insisted that his own kids play noncompetitive baseball.

The reason? He believes that competition is too individualistic, supports a spirit of rivalry and undermines the cooperative attitude that we should foster in ourselves.

At this time, when people are once again gearing up for the Olympic Games, we might as well pay some attention to Professor Sandel’s lament and ask ourselves whether competition is or is not a good thing. And as with so many matters, it will come to light that no “one size fits all” answer is available to us. Nor, however, will we find that competition is some kind of human evil that has somehow managed to infiltrate the human situation so as to corrupt us all.

It will help to reflect for a moment on why some folks feel like Professor Sandel. It comes from a view of human life that was nicely sketched by Karl Marx, namely, the belief that when humanity becomes fully mature, it will look something like a wonderful choir in which we all stand next to one another, wearing about the same outfit and harmonizing in a way that gives none of us a distinctive voice but merges all voices together into a single collective sound.

It is this view that has excited the imagination of thousands of political thinkers and it is one from which most have drawn their lesson of what is best for human beings as they try to flourish in their communities. It has also lead, tragically, to massive totalitarian experiments in which people are coerced into a single mold that does violence to their human nature in the name of a misconceived dream.

A very pictorial illustration of this ideal comes to us from Communist China where, during Mao’s rule, it is was customary for millions of Chinese to march through the country together, all wearing identical looking blue pajamas. (Never mind that the fabric of which these garments were made revealed a serious class differentiation -- it could not be seen as the world witnessed the Chinese spectacle.)

Instead of this image of humanity as one big, identically populated choir, the real story is very different. We are much more different from one another than alike. This is not some temporary stage but the permanent condition of our human lives. We are not only significantly different in our biological make-up but our free will leads us to make different decisions as we face the diverse circumstances of our lives.

And most importantly, even where we face common circumstances, we often exert different levels of attention and effort, leading to different outcomes in our diverse lives.

As usual, there are symbolic ways that these basic facts are literally played out in human communities and the Olympic Games are the most visible and celebrated ways that we have come to register the spirit of competition in our lives. This competition is not at all the disharmonizing, acrimonious, alienating and hostile affair that critics make it out to be; quite the contrary.

If you watch carefully you will notice that the bulk of the Olympic events, quite like much of competitive life, are peaceful and even friendly, but demonstrative of the fact that human living requires close attention and much effort so as that we may flourish at it. It may not be for everyone, either, this spirit of competition. But where it exists, it can be a show of human beings making the effort to do their best at some task.

In fact, competition isn’t primarily rivalry at all. That part of it is may sometimes overshadow what is most important about it, namely, the mutual and harmonious effort to excel at something. Sure, the spectators and the promoters often stress the rivalry but it would be a mistake to take that to be the essence of what is going on and what is being symbolically represented about human community life.

Competition is built into the fact of our individuality and mutual striving to make something of ourselves in the myriad of activities in which we take part. And apart from some cases of corruption--which, of course, can plague any aspect of human living--competition gives us a symbolic expression of one of life’s realities, namely, that there is no guarantee of success and that everyone needs to work hard to get ahead but can do this with mutual respect and even in friendship.

 

All Rights Reserved ©
Image Source: commons.wikimedia.org
What is the Mises Institute?

The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard. 

Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.

Become a Member
Mises Institute