Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

Dimensions and Economics: Some Answers

The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Downloads

 

Volume 8, No. 4 (Winter 2005)

 

William Barnett’s critique of mathematics in economic analysis, “Dimensions and Economics: Some Problems,” claims that economics almost always uses functions and equations without paying any attention to their variable and parameter dimensions and units. By casual observation, that criticism appears often to be true, and it applies not only to functions and equations but also to relations of all sorts, including inequalities. Following his introduction, Barnett makes his main case in three sections, using two different examples: The Cobb-Douglas production function, whose parameters he sees as having (1) “meaningless or economically unreasonable dimensions” and (2) “inconstant” dimensions. A macroeconomic model, whose technology (production) function’s parameters.  he sees as either (3) “meaningless,” or else as defining a function that relates output hours to labor input hours, which yields “no net production.” Either way, the model is “not defensible.”

CITE THIS ARTICLE

Folsom, Roger Nils and Rodolfo Alejo Gonzalez. "Dimensions and Economics: Some Answers." The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 8, No. 4 (Winter 2005): 45–65.

All Rights Reserved ©
What is the Mises Institute?

The Mises Institute is a non-profit organization that exists to promote teaching and research in the Austrian School of economics, individual freedom, honest history, and international peace, in the tradition of Ludwig von Mises and Murray N. Rothbard. 

Non-political, non-partisan, and non-PC, we advocate a radical shift in the intellectual climate, away from statism and toward a private property order. We believe that our foundational ideas are of permanent value, and oppose all efforts at compromise, sellout, and amalgamation of these ideas with fashionable political, cultural, and social doctrines inimical to their spirit.

Become a Member
Mises Institute